MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2533618188

Deterministic, Weak-scaling Parallelism for Wirelength- and Timing-driven FPGA Placement, Suitable for Multicore and Manycore Architectures

2015· dissertation· en· W2533618188 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Christian Fobel

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVLSI and FPGA Design Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaStrong
KeywordsParallel computingParallelism (grammar)Field-programmable gate arrayScalingComputer scienceMulti-core processorComputer architectureComputational scienceEmbedded systemMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Field-Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) enable rapid-prototyping of digital logic designs in-house, without the significant up-front expense of building custom fabrication facilities. However, as the number of resources on each new generation of FPGAs continues to grow rapidly, enormous pressure is placed on the development of algorithms to reduce hardware compilation times to maintain the competitive advantage of using FPGAs. Approximately half of the compilation time for FPGA designs is spent performing placement (which is NP-hard). Serial simulated annealing is typically used for placement in practice, where runtime unfortunately grows exponentially with circuit size to be placed. Therefore, development of parallel placement algorithms that can harness the increasingly abundant throughput of modern manycore architectures to improve runtimes remains a critical concern. Parallel FPGA placement methods in literature provide no theoretical basis for scalability, and reported runtime results suggest non-parallelizable work scaling with the size of the problem, preventing scaling. We propose a parallel FPGA placement methodology based on "completely parallelizable" patterns, leading to a weak-scaling isoefficiency function in Big-Theta(p log p), while maintaining determinism. For placement, this means deterministic results where linear speedups are expected as the number of parallel worker threads (p) increases as long as the problem size (i.e., netlist size) grows accordingly. Using parallel patterns, we also propose the first scalable algorithms for timing analysis, which are ideally suited for modern manycore architectures, such as GPUs. Our experimental results show that our proposed wirelength- and timing-driven placement tools achieve mean absolute runtime improvements of 19x and 31x, respectively, on a commodity GPU over a state-of-the-art academic placer (VPR). With respect to quality, our wirelength-driven tool improves solution quality by 5% over VPR, while our timing-driven placer improves critical-path delay by 20% compared to our proposed wirelength driven method. Our results also indicate increased parallel efficiency as the size of the problem grows. Since both the parallel worker count on modern commodity parallel architectures and the number of resources available on modern FPGAs are growing rapidly, weak-scaling is an ideal fit for parallel FPGA placement to provide sustainable performance for future FPGA designs and manycore architectures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.810
Threshold uncertainty score0.948

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)Same topicVLSI and FPGA Design TechniquesFrench-language works237,207