MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

YorkU.Impermeable/Pond.Oct17-2016

2016· article· en· W2533863856 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shah Numra, Njoroge Moses, Ho Candice

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmphibian and Reptile Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Meta DataCensus: This variable represents the week that is being sampled. Week 7 is defined as census 2.Campus: This categorical variable defines the campus that the study is being conducted.Habitat: This categorical variable defines the type of habitat used in the study. An impermeable habitat represents a paved area that contains impermeable materials such as rocks and gravel.The impermeable habitat studied was at the baseball diamond near Saywells woodlot. A pond habitat represents an area with a small body of water, at least 100 m in diameter. The area near stong pond was studied.Replicates: A total number of 25 quadrats were used to survey herbaceous plants. A total of 25 replicates were performed to survey woody plants. A total of 6 replicates for pan traps and 10 replicates for sweep nets were performed to survey invertebrates.1 replicate was conducted to observe vertebrates abundance. Abundance of native plants: This continuous variable measures the total number of individual plants that are native to Ontario within a quadrat.Abundance of exotic plants: This continuous variable measures the total number of individual plants that are exotic in Ontario within a quadrat.Total number of flowers: This continuous variable measures the total number of independent flower heads within a quadrat.Abundance of woody plants: This continuous variable measures the amount of a trees present within 0.5 meters of the transect. The tree must be larger than 1.5 meters.Canopy cover: This continuous variable represents the amount of canopy coverage of a tree by looking up. It was measured by holding both hands up towards the sky to form a square.Ground cover: This continuous variable measures the amount of vegetative ground cover by looking down. It was measured by holding both hands towards the ground to form a square.Total number of flowers: This continuous variable represents the amount of observed plant species.Abundance of vertebrates: This continuous variable measures the amount of animals located within a 50 meter radius and duration of 15 minutes.Vertebrate species: This categorical variable represents the type of specie observed within a 50 meter radius and duration of 15 minutes.Abundance of humans: This continuous variable measures the amount of human population that interact with the area but are not involved in the lab for a duration of 15 minutes.Abundance of invertebrates observed: This continuous variable measures the observed number of invertebrates within a 5 meter radius of the given habitat for a duration of 15 minutes.Abundance of invertebrates in pan traps: This continuous variable represents the observed number of invertebrates collected within colourful bowls (blue, white and yellow) that contain soapy water.Abundance of invertebrates in sweep nets: This continuous variable represents the observed number of invertebrates captured in the sweep nets at the end of the 50 meter length transect.DescriptionOn October 17th, 2016 a study conducted by Candice, Moses and Numra was performed in the baseball diamond near Saywells woodlot (impermeable) and near Stong pond at York University. The temperature was 17 degrees, with significant cloud and fog cover. The impermeable area GPS coordinates are; latitude: 43. 76832, longitude: -79.50731, elevation: 137.74579. The pond habitat GPS coordinates are; latitude: 43. 77057, longitude: -79.50663, elevation: 151.32195. The study was conducted to compare different habitats across various universities by using transects, quadrats, pan traps and sweep nets.MethodsThe data collection for the impermeable habitat began at 2:50 pm and ended at 3:30 pm. The data collection near the pond habitat began at 3:40 pm and ended at 4:15 pm. In order to survey the herbaceous plants, a 50 meter transect was randomly placed. A quadrat was placed every 2 meters of the transect, by alternating left to right. The abundance of native plants, exotic plants and number of flower heads within the quadrat were recorded. The quadrat was divided into 4 squares. The abundance of plants within a square were recorded and multiplied by 4 to represent the whole quadrat. The woody plants were then surveyed along the 50 meter transect. The presence of a tree that is larger than 1.5 meters and within 0.5 meters of the transect was observed at every 2 meters. At every other meter, the canopy coverage was recorded by looking up and using 2 hands to form a square. Alternatively, at every other meter, the vegetation ground coverage was measured by looking down and using 2 hands to form a square. The number of flowers surrounding the transect was also calculated. Next, the data survey for the vertebrate and invertebrate was conducted within a 50 meter radius. The abundance of vertebrates was recorded by counting the total number of individuals. The specie type was also observed for a 15 minute interval. The abundance of invertebrates, for example, flying insects observed was recorded for 15 minutes within a 5 meter radius.In order to survey invertebrates, pan trap and sweep net techniques were used. A total of 6 pan traps, in alternating colours (white, yellow and blue) contained soapy water solution and were placed every 3 meters along the 50 meter transect. After 40 minutes, the amount of invertebrates present in the pan traps were counted. The sweep net technique was performed by sweeping the net in a figure 8 motion, right to left along the the 50 meter distance of the transect. A total of ten repetitions were made in each habitat.HypothesisThe diversity between plant and animal species near stong pond should be greater, in comparison to the impermeable habitat in the baseball diamond near the saywell woodlot. Predictions1. High human interference will cause decreased abundance in plant and animal species.The baseball diamond near saywell woodlot will have very little animal and plant diversity because of the constant negative human presence around the habitat. In addition, the baseball field in itself is not an ideal habitat to promote plant and animal diversity because it has been significantly altered into pavement and gravel. 2. Low human interference will cause increased abundance in plant and animal species.The habitat near stong pond will be more diverse, plant and animal wise because there is minimal human disturbance to alter the area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.256
Threshold uncertainty score0.365

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.7440.635

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshare→Same topicAmphibian and Reptile Biology→French-language works237,207→