MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

On control of HCCI combustion-neural network approach

2006· article· en· W2533937572 on OpenAlex
Mitra Mirhassani, Xiang Chen, Ali Tahmasebi, Majid Ahmadi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHomogeneous charge compression ignitionCombustionComputer scienceArtificial neural networkController (irrigation)Automotive engineeringIgnition systemNOxControl engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligenceCombustion chamberAerospace engineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to environmental consideration and recent regulations on the car emission, new technologies are explored. HCCI engine, thanks to its low NOx emission and high efficiency may be one of the candidate solutions. Therefore, exploration of enhanced HCCI combustion control is of strong interest to both the auto industry and the academic community and of a challenge due to complexities in ignition timing prediction. In this paper, application of a neural network assisted controller for a control-based model of an HCCI combustion engines is explore. The model is updated on-line and is used to predict the ignition timing. Simulation results show that the controller is able to predict the proper inputs to the model and to track the desired peak pressure accurately. Hence a neural-network-based control strategy could be potentially established for HCCI combustion control

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score0.457

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Combustion Engine TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207