MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2533945726 · doi:10.4000/sociologies.5683

L’institution de la communauté

2021· article· fr· W2533945726 on OpenAlexaffabout
Stéphane Vibert

Bibliographic record

VenueSociologieS · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPhilosophy, Sociology, Political Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceMilitantSociologyPhilosophyPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A l’aune des luttes sociales et culturelles contre l’ordre capitaliste et l’État entrepreneurial, la sociologie politique du commun théorisée dans l’ouvrage de Pierre Dardot et Christian Laval Commun (2014) entreprend de fonder l’agir politique et militant sur une praxis instituante qui génère des sujets collectifs orientés vers les notions coactivité, participation, délibération et codécision. Ce texte vise à souligner les apports et limites d’une conception radicalement anti-essentialiste du monde social-historique qui, tout en s’appuyant sur une conception dialectique des institutions, prend le risque de verser parfois dans une conception pragmatiste et désincarnée des univers socio-culturels, illustrée par le recours aux « communes » auto-instituées, autogérées et fédérées comme seules entités collectives légitimes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.704
Threshold uncertainty score0.982

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.020
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSociologieSSame topicPhilosophy, Sociology, Political TheoryFrench-language works237,207