MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2534400317

Model order reduction using PSO algorithm and it's application to power systems

2009· article· en· W2534400317 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Conference on Electric Power and Energy Conversion Systems · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicModel Reduction and Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectric power systemReduction (mathematics)Particle swarm optimizationComputer scienceMathematical optimizationNonlinear systemPower (physics)Control theory (sociology)AlgorithmMathematicsArtificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Power systems are high order nonlinear large-scale systems with randomly changing operating conditions. Due to that an appropriate model order reduction technique is a must in power system analysis. Most of the existing methods are suitable only for linear systems. The main problem is that linearized models of power systems could be non-minimum phase, unstable or improper. Therefore, not all model order reduction techniques could be used for power systems. In this paper, Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) method is used for model reduction of power systems. The main advantage of the developed method in this paper is that it is applicable for all systems and not restricted to only stable or strictly proper systems. Therefore, it is most suitable for power systems. Simulation results show the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.932
Threshold uncertainty score0.712

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it