PC3 - 216 Presentation of Intradural Extramedullary Plasmacytoma with Intratumoral Hemorrhage: Case Report and Review of Literature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Plasmacytomas are solitary tumours characterized by neoplastic proliferation of plasma cells and can be found isolated or in associated with multiple myeloma. Plasmacytomas uncommonly occur intracranially, and dural plasmacytomas without involvement of the calvarium are exceedingly rare. Reported cases indicate durally-based plasmacytomas mimick the appearance of meningioma, lymphoma or sarcoma of the dura. The authors report a case of a 77-year-old male with known multiple myeloma who presented with a 3-week history of confusion, speech impediment, and right sided weakness. A non-contrast CT scan revealed a dense extra-axial mass in the left frontal lobe with initial concerns of an extra-axial hemorrhage. A subsequent MRI demonstrated a contrast enhancing mass with a broad-based dural tail and no underlying calvarial lesion. Differential diagnosis included meningioma or intracranial plasmacytoma. The patient underwent surgical resection and was found to have intratumoural hemorrhage, with pathology confirming plasmacytoma. In the published literature, there are only 20 prior reports of dural plasmacytomas (with and without primary calvarial infiltration), of which only five previous cases reported associated intratumoural hemorrhage. Our case, along with this literature, suggests that new onset of focal neurologic deficits in patients with a history of multiple myeloma merits careful investigation, and that intracranial plasmacytoma should be considered on the differential diagnosis even when imaging reveals masses consistent with hemorrhage or meningioma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".