MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2534642913 · doi:10.1109/distra.2001.946437

HLA real-time extension

2001· article· en· W2534642913 on OpenAlexaff
Hui Zhao, N.D. Georganas

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicReal-Time Systems Scheduling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommon Object Request Broker ArchitectureComputer scienceHigh-level architectureQuality of serviceJitterThe InternetConstruct (python library)SuiteDistributed computingEmbedded systemComputer networkOperating systemInteroperabilityTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The HLA-RTI provides a general-purpose network communication mechanism for Distributed Interactive Simulation (DIS), but it has limitations on Real-Time DIS (RT-DIS). The Internet is moving to an age of QoS (quality of service), providing delay and jitter bounded services. With IP QoS and a real-time operating system, HLA makes it possible to construct a real-time architecture for RT-DIS, a critical aspect of applications in virtual medicine, distributed virtual environments, weapon simulation, aerospace simulation, and others. This paper outlines the current real-time technology at the operating system and network infrastructure level. It then summarizes the requirements and the experience of using RT-DIS. Afer analyzing the limitations of current HLA and RTI, a proposal of a real-time extension to HLA is presented and an architecture for real-time RTI is suggested. Similar to the growth of real-time CORBA afer the mature based CORBA standard suite, Real-Time HLA is a natural extension following the standardization of HLA as IEEE 1516 in September of 2000.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReal-Time Systems SchedulingFrench-language works237,207