MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2534682021 · doi:10.7202/1037335ar

Dispositifs sonores et écoute performative : le cas de l’Autoteatro par la compagnie Rotozaza

2016· article· fr· W2534682021 on OpenAlex
Anyssa Kapelusz

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueL’Annuaire théâtral Revue québécoise d’études théâtrales · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversità degli Studi di Firenze
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Avec le cycle Autoteatro , la compagnie britannique Rotozaza crée, depuis 2007, des protocoles participatifs qui s’appuient sur des bandes-son préenregistrées. Celles-ci permettent de cadrer et d’organiser la rencontre et les interactions ludiques entre plusieurs spectateurs. Destinés à être performés, ces dispositifs sonores génèrent une expérience spécifique chez le participant, impliquant l’émergence d’une « écoute performative » qui se construit dans une tension vers l’acte à incorporer et à effectuer. Plus encore, ces dispositifs constituent une interrogation en acte de la théâtralité, puisque s’y opère un bouleversement des fonctions actoriales et spectatorielles. Ils offrent de réfléchir au développement de pratiques spectatrices singulières et diversifiées.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.909
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it