Dispositifs sonores et écoute performative : le cas de l’Autoteatro par la compagnie Rotozaza
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Avec le cycle Autoteatro, la compagnie britannique Rotozaza crée, depuis 2007, des protocoles participatifs qui s’appuient sur des bandes-son préenregistrées. Celles-ci permettent de cadrer et d’organiser la rencontre et les interactions ludiques entre plusieurs spectateurs. Destinés à être performés, ces dispositifs sonores génèrent une expérience spécifique chez le participant, impliquant l’émergence d’une « écoute performative » qui se construit dans une tension vers l’acte à incorporer et à effectuer. Plus encore, ces dispositifs constituent une interrogation en acte de la théâtralité, puisque s’y opère un bouleversement des fonctions actoriales et spectatorielles. Ils offrent de réfléchir au développement de pratiques spectatrices singulières et diversifiées.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".