MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Augmented Reality with Hololens: Experiential Architectures Embedded in the Real World

2017· preprint· en· W2534687160 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueAuthorea · 2017
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExperiential learningNewcastle upon tyneArchitectureVisual artsLived experienceResearch councilWork (physics)Art historyArtMedia studiesSociologyEngineeringPsychologyPedagogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

_Additional notes:_ Authors: - Paul Hockett, National Research Council of Canada, 100 Sussex Drive, Ottawa, K1A 0R6, Canada - Tim Ingleby, Department of Architecture and Built Environment, Northumbria University, Ellison Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8ST, UK Links: - Online version: Authorea, DOI: 10.22541/au.148821660.05483993 - Repository for videos and files, Figshare, DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3470907 - Arxiv version (1610.04281) - Ongoing work: femtolab.ca

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score0.955

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it