MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2534732770 · doi:10.1109/acssc.2006.355175

Robust Minimum Variance Beamforming with Dual Response Constraints

2006· article· en· W2534732770 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Robinson, Ioannis Psaromiligkos

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDirection-of-Arrival Estimation Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRobustness (evolution)Control theory (sociology)BeamformingAdaptive beamformerComputer scienceConstraint (computer-aided design)DiagonalFilter (signal processing)Mathematical optimizationMathematicsAlgorithmTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The minimum variance distortionless response (MVDR) beamformer is a popular method of combining multiple antenna outputs in order to recover a signal of interest (SOI) with known steering vector in the presence of noise and interference. However, in practice the precise value of the SOI steering vector is unknown and only an estimate is used. In hopes of protecting the actual SOI in case of mismatches it has been recently proposed to use a non-attenuation constraint inside a hypersphere centered at the presumed SOI steering vector. In an effort to strike a balance between robustness to steering vector error and interference-plus-noise suppression, we propose in this paper to use two concentric hyperspheres instead of one with different degrees of protection in each. We determine conditions on the user defined parameters to ensure existence of a solution to the resulting constrained optimization problem. The multiply constrained filter solution is demonstrated to be of the diagonally loaded type with adaptive loading factor. We further give necessary conditions for the two-constraint filter to be distinct, in terms of SINR, to the one-constraint case. Numerical simulations show that using two constraints yields improved SINR performance compared to one constraint for small steering vector mismatches or large input SNR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.843
Threshold uncertainty score0.335

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDirection-of-Arrival Estimation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207