MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2534863318 · doi:10.1101/080382

Semi-automated genome annotation using epigenomic data and Segway

2016· preprint· en· W2534863318 on OpenAlexafffund
Eric G. Roberts, Mickaël Mendez, Coby Viner, Mehran Karimzadeh, Rachel C.W. Chan, Rachel Ancar, Davide Chicco, Jay R. Hesselberth, Anshul Kundaje, Michael M. Hoffman

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2016
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institutes of HealthUniversity of TorontoOntario Ministry of Research, Innovation and ScienceGovernment of OntarioNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaPrincess Margaret Cancer FoundationChina Scholarship CouncilAmerican Cancer Society
KeywordsGenomeAnnotationChromatinGenome browserComputer scienceComputational biologyEpigenomicsSoftwareGenome projectBiologyGeneticsGenomicsDNADNA methylationGeneProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biochemical techniques measure many individual properties of chromatin along the genome. These properties include DNA accessibility (measured by DNase-seq) and the presence of individual transcription factors and histone modifications (measured by ChIP-seq). Segway is software that transforms multiple datasets on chromatin properties into a single annotation of the genome that a biologist can more easily interpret. This protocol describes how to use Segway to annotate the genome, starting with reads from a ChIP-seq experiment. It includes pre-processing of data, training the Segway model, annotating the genome, assigning biological meanings to labels, and visualizing the annotation in a genome browser.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsFrench-language works237,207