MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2534919461 · doi:10.1109/tic-sth.2009.5444456

Classification of SHOALS 3000 bathymetric LiDAR signals using decision tree and ensemble techniques

2009· article· en· W2534919461 on OpenAlexafffund
Ramu Narayanan, Heungsik Brian Kim, Gunho Sohn

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersYork University
KeywordsShoalLidarBathymetryDecision treeComputer scienceRemote sensingWaveformTree (set theory)Data miningGeographyGeologyCartographyOceanographyRadarMathematicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coastal Management is a complex issue that is facing policy makers and scientists around the world. Monitoring the coast can be difficult given the vast stretch of water which needs to be covered. Ship-based surveys can take weeks to perform mapping of the coastal zone. LiDAR bathymetry is a tool which shortens the survey time at reduced survey cost. The objective of this paper is to describe the parameterization of the LiDAR waveform from the SHOALS 3000 LiDAR system and show how it can be successfully used for classification of bottom habitat. Decision tree techniques and ensemble methods are used for classification purposes. The Rotation Forest ensemble method provided the greatest overall classification accuracy of 91% averaged over all fractions of the training data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.430
Threshold uncertainty score0.270

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRemote Sensing and LiDAR ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207