MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2535032718 · doi:10.1109/have.2004.1391899

Multi-sensor data fusion architecture

2005· article· en· W2535032718 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFuzzy Logic and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSensor fusionArchitectureFusionArtificial intelligenceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work we present multi-sensor data fusion architecture. The objective of the architecture is to obtain fused measured data that represent the measured parameter as accurate as possible. The architecture is based on the use of adaptive Kalman filter formed by using Kalman filter and fuzzy logic techniques. Measurements generated from each sensor are fed into an adaptive Kalman filter. So there are n adaptive Kalman filters for n sensors working in parallel. A Correlation coefficient, produced as correlating the predicted output to measured data, is used as qualifying quantity for each adaptive Kalman filter. Based on the value of the correlation coefficient the measurement noise covariance matrix was adjusted using fuzzy logic techniques. Measurements produced from these adaptive Kalman filters were fused to form a single output. Results of testing showed notable improvement for each Kalman filter over a traditional Kalman filter. Fusing data coming from several sensors showed better results than using individual sensors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.923
Threshold uncertainty score0.553

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFuzzy Logic and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207