Female Labor Force Participation and Labor Market Outcomes in Latin America and the Caribbean
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Describes women’s participation and outcomes in the labor market in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) relative to men’s across the life cycle, comparing results across countries, looking at the dynamics of mothers’ and fathers’ behavior in the labor market, and identifying patterns of women’s engagement in paid employment, such as segregation by employment status and sector. Despite the closing of the education gap between boys and girls in the region, women’s participation in the labor force remains much lower than men’s, and even countries that have made significant progress in economic participation for women have not achieved parity. In Brazil and Costa Rica, where gender gaps in access to education parallel those in the Netherlands and Canada, women’s economic participation remains significantly lower than men’s. The gender gap in earnings persists, as does women’s higher vulnerability to unemployment; women hold more informal and precarious jobs; and the jobs women hold are concentrated in lower productivity sectors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it