MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2535060295

Utility applications of a RTDS® Simulator

2007· article· en· W2535060295 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Power Engineering Conference · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsRTDS Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReal Time Digital SimulatorPower system simulator for engineeringComputer architecture simulatorSimulationPower system simulationTransient (computer programming)Electric power systemComputer scienceRelaySoftwareHardware-in-the-loop simulationPower (physics)Operating system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The RTDS Simulator is a fully digital, real time power system simulator widely used in the industry. The system provides continuous real time electromagnetic transient simulations based on the Dommel algorithm. The simulator hardware and software have both undergone many improvements since the simulator was first introduced in the early 1990's. The improvements have increased the performance of the simulator and widened its scope of application. In particular, electric power utilities have used the system for closed-loop testing and training on controllers for HVDC, SVC and generators, closed-loop protective relay testing, and large scale real time simulation. The paper describes the simulator design and its utility applications in greater detail.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.933
Threshold uncertainty score0.532

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it