Holmes au pays des Soviets ou le commandant Pronine et son revival des années 2000
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La saga du commandant Pronine, plutôt contre-espion que détective, eut un grand succès en URSS mais vers la fin de la période soviétique tomba dans l’oubli ; par contre le personnage lui-même devint une figure importante du folklore comique. Cette œuvre de Lev Ovalov, qui prétend renouveler les structures traditionnelles du roman policier occidental à la base de la vision communiste du monde, est beaucoup plus liée à la tradition (et plus spécialement à Conan Doyle) qu’on ne le pense d’habitude. Nous analysons aussi les continuations et les pastiches de la saga écrits dans les années 2000, où à côté d’une ironie dans le goût postmoderne et la critique (modérée) du goulag on rencontre parfois des tendances idéologiques pro-staliniennes. Le livre est ainsi transféré dans un nouveau contexte socioculturel, avec ses fluctuations entre la dénégation du modèle soviétique et son revival nostalgique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".