MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2535209783 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2004.1403207

An object-oriented toolbox for linear and nonlinear system identification

2005· article· en· W2535209783 on OpenAlexaff
David T. Westwick, Robert E. Kearney

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsToolboxComputer scienceIdentification (biology)Variety (cybernetics)Nonlinear systemMATLABSystem identificationSet (abstract data type)Nonlinear system identificationConstruct (python library)Control engineeringCascadeArtificial intelligenceMachine learningComputer engineeringSoftware engineeringData modelingEngineeringProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nonlinear system identification techniques are often used to construct mathematical models of physiological systems. There is a wide variety of model structures, many of which require specialized techniques for their identification. Unfortunately, this variety may present a significant barrier to any non-specialists who wish to use these methods. This work describes a MATLAB based toolbox that addresses these problems by providing a common environment supporting a robust set of tools for the identification, simulation, and manipulation of important model structures. The design philosophy and its implementation are described. An illustrative example, constructing a parallel cascade model of the dynamic stiffness of the human ankle, is used to demonstrate many of the features of the toolbox.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.188

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0560.045

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMuscle activation and electromyography studies→French-language works237,207→