MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2535284967 · doi:10.1109/iembs.1996.647554

Spikelets and electrical coupling in hippocampal neurons

2002· article· en· W2535284967 on OpenAlexaff
Edward J. Vigmond, Berj L. Bardakjian

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoupling (piping)Hippocampal formationAmplitudeGap junctionElectrical SynapsesPhysicsNeuroscienceChemistryMaterials scienceBiophysicsBiological systemBiologyOpticsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electrical coupling in hippocampal slices may lead to or enhance epileptiform bursts. Spikelets are biphasic potentials recorded intracellularly from neurons ranging up to 5 millivolts in amplitude resulting from electrical coupling. They have been shown to be very similar in appearance to differentiated action potentials. The mechanism responsible for their appearance has been linked to both field effects and gap junctions although the exact role of each is not known. The boundary element method was used to implement 3-dimensional models of neurons complete with dendritic trees. A novel approach was employed which used a mixture of triangular somatic elements and cylindrical dendritic elements. Based on the results, it is hypothesized that spikelets are due to field effects of several neurons whose electrical activity is synchronized by gap junctions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research→French-language works237,207→