MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2535304227 · doi:10.1109/tap.2016.2618854

Dual-Band Microstrip Patch Antenna Using Integrated Uniplanar Metamaterial-Based EBGs

2016· article· en· W2535304227 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of TorontoCMC Microsystems
KeywordsMetamaterialMetamaterial antennaMicrostrip antennaPatch antennaMicrostripMiniaturizationMulti-band deviceAntenna (radio)Materials scienceTransmission lineAcousticsOpticsOptoelectronicsComputer sciencePhysicsSlot antennaTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel dual-band microstrip patch antenna that employs a metamaterial-based electromagnetic bandgap (MTM-EBG) integrated into its radiating edges to support two distinct operating frequencies. The resulting antenna is compact, uniplanar, completely printable, and via-free. Dispersion engineering of the MTM-EBG unit cell through a rigorous multiconductor transmission-line analysis allows simple, systematic design for two or more arbitrary frequencies. Additionally, a novel approach is taken to employ the same MTM-EBG to impedance-match the antenna to an inset microstrip feed at both operating frequencies. A dual-band MTM-EBG antenna designed to radiate at 2.4 and 5.0 GHz is simulated and tested, and experimental results demonstrate radiation performance comparable to the corresponding conventional patch antennas in excellent agreement with simulations, while also affording some degree of miniaturization at lower frequencies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.701
Threshold uncertainty score0.736

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it