MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2535361679 · doi:10.1109/nssmic.2004.1466672

The effect of SPECT reconstruction corrections on the absolute and relative quantitative accuracy of myocardial perfusion studies

2005· article· en· W2535361679 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004. · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImaging phantomCorrection for attenuationAttenuationSingle-photon emission computed tomographyIterative reconstructionPhysicsNuclear medicineImage resolutionSpect imagingEmission computed tomographyApproximation errorProjection (relational algebra)MathematicsOpticsPositron emission tomographyComputer scienceAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper reports the findings of investigations into the performance of SPECT corrections for photon attenuation, distance-dependent resolution loss and photon scatter on the absolute and relative quantitative accuracy of myocardial perfusion studies. The measurements of myocardial wall thickness and myocardial infarct size were used to estimate the accuracy of the absolute and relative quantitative accuracy, respectively. A series of phantom studies were performed and additional information was gathered from a group of 37 normal patients. Each set of data was reconstructed with (1) filtered-back projection (FBP), (2) ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM), (3) OSEM plus attenuation correction (AC), (4) OSEM plus detector response compensation (DRC), (5) OSEM plus AC and DRC, and (6) OSEM plus AC, DRC and scatter correction (SC). The image analysis toolbox iQuant was used to perform the analysis. Both patient and phantom data showed SPECT image corrections to have a significant effect on myocardial wall thickness, with reconstructions involving SC providing the most accurate results. Phantom data showed that good estimates of anterior and lateral wall infarct sizes are provided by all reconstruction techniques, whereas good estimates of inferior and septal wall infarct sizes are only provided by reconstructions including AC. Accurate measurement of in fa rets in any location and of any size is only possible with SC. This analysis suggests that in order to achieve perfect quantitative accuracy of myocardial perfusion studies, corrections for photon attenuation, distance-dependent resolution loss and photon scatter should be applied. However, for routine clinical analysis involving visual interpretation and an estimate of infarct size, the application of attenuation correction and detector resolution compensation might be considered sufficient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.530
Threshold uncertainty score0.883

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it