MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2535399223 · doi:10.1109/icccas.2002.1180651

Mobility support for differentiated services in next generation MPLS-based wireless networks

2003· article· en· W2535399223 on OpenAlexaff
Tingzhou Yang, Yixin Dong, Yian Zhang, Dimitrios Makrakis

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIPv6, Mobility, Handover, Networks, Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkMultiprotocol Label SwitchingMobile QoSQuality of serviceWireless Application ProtocolMobile computingService providerMobility managementWirelessWireless networkService (business)Telecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rapid growth of wireless networks and services, integrated with the next-generation mobile communication systems, has led to the era of the pervasive computing. The popularity of the lightweight portable computers with the growing demands of transmitting real-time multimedia applications over the wireless Internet provides strong motivations to the service providers to support not only seamless user mobility, but also continuous and seamless service provisions to the customers. We propose a mobile differentiated services architecture for next generation wireless networks based on the hierarchical mobile MPLS (H-MPLS). We also propose an extension to the current H-MPLS protocol and make it applicable to our architecture. This mobile differentiated services mechanism is applied to satisfy the QoS requirements of mobile users who subscribe services in their home domain and move into some other foreign domains. Hence, the mobile users could enjoy the continuous services without worrying about where they are. A series of simulations, with multimedia applications like video and voice, were performed to evaluate the proposed system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIPv6, Mobility, Handover, Networks, SecurityFrench-language works237,207