MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Predictors of clinical outcome in patients with bone metastases from prostate cancer

2006· article· en· W2535419004 on OpenAlexaff
Fred Saad, Robert E. Coleman, Richard J. Cook, Mitchell R. Smith, Janet E. Brown, Jilong Hei, Yaqing CHEN

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and treatments
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineZoledronic acidInternal medicineProstate cancerHazard ratioProportional hazards modelCreatinineRelative riskUrologyBone remodelingCancerSurgeryOncologyConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

4555 Background: Bone metastases are a significant cause of morbidity in patients with prostate cancer (PC). To assess the predictive value of bone markers and fractures for clinical outcome in patients with bone metastases from PC, we conducted a retrospective analysis of patients in a large, randomized, controlled trial of zoledronic acid. Methods: Data were analyzed in patients treated with 4 mg zoledronic acid or placebo who had bone marker (n = 411) or fracture (n = 640) information. Cox regression models, adjusted for treatment group, were used to assess the association between bone markers (urinary N-telopeptide [NTX] and bone alkaline phosphatase [BALP]) or fractures (time-dependent variable) and the risk of death or of experiencing a first skeletal-related event (SRE) on study. For bone marker analyses, patients were grouped by low (< 50 nmol/mmol creatinine), moderate (50 to 99), or high (≥ 100) NTX levels and by low (< 146 U/L) or high (≥ 146) BALP. Results: Patients who experienced a fracture on study (19%) had shorter survival compared with patients who did not; the hazard ratio for death was 1.29 (95% CI = 1.01, 1.65; P = .04), suggesting 29% increased risk of death among these patients. When adjusted for previous SRE and baseline ECOG performance status ≥ 2, the risk for death associated with fractures was increased by 23% and trended toward statistical significance (P = .10). Patients with high NTX levels had significantly increased risk of SREs and disease progression (P < .001) compared with patients with low NTX. Relative to low NTX levels, high and moderate NTX levels were associated with a 5.72-fold (95% CI = 4.04, 8.11; P < .001) and 4.10-fold (95% CI = 2.81, 5.97; P < .001) increased risk of death, respectively. High BALP also significantly correlated with an increased risk of a first on-study SRE (P = .028) and bone lesion progression (P < .001). Conclusions: These analyses suggest that pathologic fractures are associated with increased risk if death and that high bone marker levels are associated with increased risk of SREs, bone lesion progression, and shorter survival in patients with PC and bone metastases. The results support appropriate treatment for the prevention of fractures and to decrease bone marker levels. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.491
Teacher spread0.386 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicBone health and treatments→French-language works237,207→