Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>O <em>Romance d’a Pedra do Reino e o Príncipe do Sangue do Vai-e-Volta</em>, livro de Ariano Suassuna, é o corpus deste trabalho. A fim de buscar entendimento da simbologia risível da narrativa, a investigação se pauta nas vertentes temáticas da tradição religiosa e da profana decorrentes do medievo. No trabalho nos propomos a apresentar algumas aproximações entre a cultura brasileira contemporânea e a Idade Média, verificando, especificamente, <em>os resíduos</em>, ou melhor, o que restou, permaneceu no romance, do imaginário mediévico. O método de investigação é o proporcionado pela <em>Teoria da Residualidade</em>, de Roberto Pontes, que tem como premissa estudar os <em>resíduos </em>de um passado próximo ou distante, os quais permanecem de um tempo em outro numa narrativa ou cultura. Segundo os pressupostos dessa teoria, os indicadores culturais estão presentes na <em>mentalidade </em>de uma sociedade sob forma <em>cristalizada</em>, e decorrem da <em>hibridação cultural </em>havida entre o Brasil e os demais povos.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".