MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Establishment and Characterization of a New Human Ph+ Erythroleukemic Cell Line, VES.

2005· article· en· W2535606979 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mirna Golemović, Lana Rnjak, Klara Dubravčić, Sanja Davidović-Mrsić, Ivana Franić, Sunčica Ries, Koraljka Gjadrov, Merica Aralica, Zdravko Mitrović, Ranka Serventi Seiwerth, Boris Labar, Drago Batinić

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBone marrowCell cultureStromal cellHaematopoiesisBiologyGlutamineMolecular biologyPeripheral blood mononuclear cellTransplantationIn vitroImmunologyStem cellAndrologyCancer researchMedicineCell biologyInternal medicineBiochemistryGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Continuous human malignant hematopoietic cell lines are invaluable tool for hematological research. Here we report on a new erythroleukemic cell line termed VES that was established from the bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMNC) of a 22-year-old woman with Ph+ CML during her second post-transplant period. Actually, after unsuccessful allo-transplantation, the patient received auto-transplant that also failed to engraft. At the time of initiation of BMNC into culture for the analysis of stromal cell capacity, her bone marrow was tested Ph-negative by both FISH and PCR. Instead of establishment of an adherent stromal layer in vitro, blast-like cells appeared in the supernatant on day 27. These blast cells expressed highly amplified bcr/abl locus as shown by FISH, whereas the patient’s bone marrow was still Ph-negative at the time. Following a very short period, the cultured cells started to express stable features of erythroleukemia cell line. Optimal growth was obtained by suspending the cells at concentration of 0.3x106 cells/ml in IMDM containing 10% FBS, 1% penicillin-streptomycin and 1% L-glutamine solution. After 3 days of culture, cell concentration varied between 1.3 and 1.8x106 cells/ml. VES cells were tested negative for the presence of EBV virus. For analysis of clonogenicity, VES cells at concentration of 103/ml were grown in a serum-free methylcellulose medium without cytokines (H4236; StemCell Tech., Canada). Following 7-day culture, 103 VES cells produced 251 ±42 and after 14 days 431 ±30 GF-independent colonies. Furthermore, on day 14 of the cell culture it was possible to observe reddish color of the colonies indicating the presence of hemoglobin. Cytological examination of cytospin preparations indicated homogenous population of leukemia blasts (>80%) the majority of them (>90%) being glycophorinA positive and MPO negative. Imunophenotyping and multiparameter flow cytometry revealed proerythroblastic lineage-associated profile: GlyA/CD235a+, CD11b+, CD15+, CD29+, CD33+, and CD117+. Conventional cytogenetics revealed complex karyotype with multiple numerical/structural abnormalities (MAKA), while metaphase FISH revealed the following aberrations: t(9;22), 5q31, 7q31, +8, +6. Since FISH analysis detected highly amplified bcr/abl locus, we tested VES cells’ sensitivity to imatinib (Gleevec). Treatment with imatinib for 3 days (MTS assay) inhibited proliferation of VES cells with IC50 value of 0.2mM. Following 14 days of culture in methylcellulose medium with addition of 0.2mM imatinib, the clonogenic potential of VES cells was reduced by 55% in relation to untreated control. We demonstrated that imatinib induced apoptosis in VES cells in time- and dose-dependant manner, assessed with AnnexinV and PI staining, while there were no significant changes observed in the cell cycle except for a mild increase in cells in G0/G1 phase. Although further analyses are required, we believe that VES cells represent a new Ph+ erythroleukemia cell line and a suitable model for studying Ph+ malignant hematopoiesis in vitro.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation→French-language works237,207→