MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2535860792 · doi:10.1145/2966986.2980085

GPlace

2016· article· en· W2535860792 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVLSI and Analog Circuit Testing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsField-programmable gate arrayCONTESTRouting (electronic design automation)Computer sciencePlacer miningParallel computingEmbedded systemComputer architecture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Traditional FPGA flows that wait until the routing stage to tackle congestion are quickly becoming less effective. This is due to the increasing size and complexity of FPGA architectures and the designs targeted for them. In this paper, we present two new congestion-aware placement tools for Xilinx UltraScale architectures, called GPlace-pack and GPlace-flat, respectively. The former placer participated in the ISPD 2016 Routability-driven Placement Contest for FPGAs, and finished in third place overall. The latter placer was subseqently developed based on our experience in the contest with GPlace-pack. Results obtained indicate that GPlace-flat is on average 5.3× faster than GPlace-pack. The post routing results show that GPlace-flat is able to obtain a further 22.5% improvement in wirelength and a 40.0% improvement in runtime compared to GPlace-pack.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.525

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVLSI and Analog Circuit TestingFrench-language works237,207