MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2535963136 · doi:10.1109/leosst.1997.619147

An absolute frequency reference at 1556 nm for WDM communication systems

2002· article· en· W2535963136 on OpenAlexaff
M. Poulin, C. Latrasse, N. Cyr, M. Têtu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhotorefractive and Nonlinear Optics
Canadian institutionsInstitut National d'Optique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRubidiumLaserFrequency standardHarmonicCalibrationOpticsLock (firearm)Materials sciencePhysicsOptoelectronicsEngineeringAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Standardization of channel frequency allocation and calibration of the frequency scale at 1.55 /spl mu/m will require some frequency standards in this range. A promising avenue consists of making use of the two-photon transitions of rubidium at 778 nm to frequency-lock a 1556 nm laser. These lines have been recently measured by direct comparison to the Cs frequency standard with an uncertainty of 2 kHz. The method which we develop consists in using the second harmonic of the 1556 nm laser to injection-lock a low-cost laser diode operating at 778 nm which is then used to observe the transitions in rubidium.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.756
Threshold uncertainty score0.711

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhotorefractive and Nonlinear OpticsFrench-language works237,207