MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2536014086

Sensitivity of topographic slope and modeled watershed soil loss to DEM resolution

2012· article· en· W2536014086 on OpenAlexaffabout
Tristan Goulden, Chris Hopkinson, Rob Jamieson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigital elevation modelWatershedHydrology (agriculture)Surface runoffSedimentLidarGeologyEnvironmental scienceRemote sensingGeomorphology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Digital Elevation Model (DEM) is a critical component for the parameterization of processbased watershed models. The influence of DEM resolution on runoff or water quality outputs is frequently ignored within watershed modeling studies. This research focuses on the effects of varying spatial DEM resolution on the determination of slope and how this can influence sediment yield estimates within a processbased watershed model. The 784 ha Thomas Brook watershed in Nova Scotia, Canada was used as a case study. The grid spacing of a LiDAR derived DEM was created at 1, 5, 10 and 20 meters and used to generate slope maps and predicted sediment loss with the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). It was found that the occurrence of steep slopes increased in fine spatial resolution DEMs while predicted sediment loss decreased.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.261
Threshold uncertainty score0.519

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies→French-language works237,207→