Pour une pédagogie féministe de l’enseignement des méthodologies (féministes)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette note d’action, écrite par une enseignante des méthodologies féministes en contexte universitaire, trace un portrait sommaire des multiples rôles assumés par les personnes étudiantes dans la coconstruction des connaissances à caractère plus précisément méthodologique. Que ce soit par des pédagogies interactives qui nécessitent leur participation, par les travaux d’équipe ou par le partage d’expériences pertinentes relativement à l’apprentissage du plus grand nombre, ces personnes se livrent, dans une certaine mesure, au coenseignement. En filigrane, le texte insiste également sur la nécessaire cohérence entre les principes féministes enseignés en classe et leur application concrète, notamment au coeur de la relation enseignante-étudiante ou étudiant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.028 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.046 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.013 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".