MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2536107944

The House of God- Heaven and Hell: A Canadian Perspective on the Empowerment of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgendered (LGBT) People Through Religion and Subjugated Knowledge

2005· article· en· W2536107944 on OpenAlexaffabout
M.S.W Darlene Mili

Bibliographic record

VenueReflections: Narratives of Professional Helping (Click on Current or Archives; Registration Optional) · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLesbianAlienationSpiritualityGender studiesHeavenPerspective (graphical)NarrativeSociologyEmpowermentHomosexualitySexual orientationTransgenderPolitical scienceLawPhilosophyTheology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since sexual minority clients experience a profound sense of alienation from, and often hostility towards, organized religion or do not hold membership in majority culture churches and denominations, therapists can be misled into thinking that religious belief and spirituality are not important to them. In fact, the opposite is often true. This narrative examines how Christian religion, particularly Catholicism, can be experienced by LGBT clients as both an empowering and disempowering phenomenon. A particular focus is placed on the same-sex marriage debate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score0.888

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0590.043
Scholarly communication0.0130.006
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0050.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.162
GPT teacher head0.477
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReflections: Narratives of Professional Helping (Click on Current or Archives; Registration Optional)→Same topicLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy→French-language works237,207→