MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2536294504 · doi:10.1093/biolreprod/85.s1.15

Lessons Learned from Mouse Models of Ovarian Cancer.

2011· article· en· W2536294504 on OpenAlexaffabout
Barbara C. Vanderhyden, Laura A. Laviolette, Kendra Hodgkinson, Kenneth Garson

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of Reproduction · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyCre recombinaseOvarian cancerTransgeneOncogeneCancerOvulationCancer researchOvaryGenetically modified mouseRecombinaseHormoneGeneGeneticsEndocrinologyCell cycle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Epithelial ovarian cancer is thought to develop from the ovarian surface epithelium (OSE), although recent evidence suggests that some cases may arise from the fallopian tube. The cancer often goes undetected until after widespread dissemination and, as a result, the factors that contribute to its initiation and progression remain poorly understood. Numerous factors have been shown to affect risk, including rupture and repair of the OSE with each ovulation, genetic factors such as deleterious mutations in the BRCA1 tumor suppressor gene, and exogenous steroid hormones. Use of oral contraceptives decreases ovarian cancer risk, whereas women who use hormone replacement therapy are at increased risk, suggesting that the functionality of the ovary at the time of exposure to exogenous hormones can dramatically alter its susceptibility to becoming tumorigenic. To enable the study of the initiating events of ovarian cancer, several models have been generated. Mouse ovaries are structurally similar to human ovaries and research in this species is facilitated by the ease of genetic manipulation. However the lack of a promoter known to drive transgene expression uniquely in OSE cells is one of the major challenges in generating mouse models of human ovarian cancer. Consequently most mouse models are based on the conditional expression of loxP-flanked target genes, with intrabursal injection of adenovirus expressing Cre recombinase being used to efficiently inactivate a tumor suppressor gene (eg. Brca1) or activate an oncogene (eg. SV40 T-antigen) specifically in the OSE cells. Using such models, we have explored the hormonal and genetic factors that contribute to the transformation of OSE to ovarian cancer, with particular focus on: 1) the morphological changes associated with early disease; 2) the consequences of Brca1 deficiency on the behavior of OSE cells; 3) the impact of estradiol on the initiation and progression of ovarian cancer; and 4) the mechanisms by which estradiol accelerates tumor progression. Inactivation of Brca1 in OSE in vivo leads to the development of preneoplastic changes, such as hyperplasias, epithelial invaginations and inclusion cysts, which arise earlier and are more numerous than in control ovaries. Using a model in which ovarian cancer is caused by inducible expression of SV40 large T-antigen in the OSE, similar early morphological changes associated with tumor initiation have been observed. Mice with prolonged exposure to estradiol during ovarian tumorigenesis have a median survival less than half that of controls, with more differentiated epithelial tumor histology. Estradiol treatment causes a much earlier onset of disease and the sensitization of the OSE to transformation is associated with increased hyperplasia. In summary, the mouse models have taught us that loss of Brca1 function, exogenous estradiol, and oncogenic signals are each able to alter the morphology of OSE and increase the formation of preneoplastic lesions that resemble the structures found in women at high risk for ovarian cancer. Estrogen exposure not only alters the behavior of normal OSE, but can accelerate both onset and progression of ovarian cancer. These models provide unique opportunities to investigate the initiating events in ovarian cancer. This research was supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Ontario Institute of Cancer Research. (platform)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.687
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.182
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology of ReproductionSame topicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatmentFrench-language works237,207