MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2536299615

A Managerial Guide For Understanding Occupational Health And Safety Legislation

2016· article· en· W2536299615 on OpenAlexaffabout
Paul Leonard Gallina

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Scientific Journal ESJ · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicRegulation and Compliance Studies
Canadian institutionsBishop's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegislationStatuteLegislatureCompliance (psychology)Occupational safety and healthBusinessSimilarity (geometry)Political sciencePublic relationsLawPsychologyComputer scienceSocial psychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper is a descriptive attempt to provide managerial understanding of occupational health and safety legislation. As such it takes a comparative approach dealing with statutes in Canada, USA, the EU, and Australia. The substantive content of this legislation is divided into eight areas with examples and commentary. The paper also argues that substantively there is a great deal of similarity across jurisdictions. Furthermore, the claim is made that knowledge of the legislative requirements is needed not only for effective managerial compliance strategies, but that the legislation does provide a set of best practices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Scientific Journal ESJSame topicRegulation and Compliance StudiesFrench-language works237,207