MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2536303826 · doi:10.4000/ebc.4130

The Multiple Meanings of The Cleft (2007) by Doris Lessing

2009· article· en· W2536303826 on OpenAlexaff
Anne-Laure Brevet

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes britanniques contemporaines · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCaribbean and African Literature and Culture
Canadian institutionsWorkplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeRewritingPresentation (obstetrics)HistoryLiteratureArtPsychoanalysisAestheticsPsychologyMedicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The framing narrative in The Cleft is meant to reveal the work of a fictitious Roman historian attempting to compile written records of oral history about the origins of mankind. Throughout the re-presentation of this prehistoric period piece and as the rewriting process goes along, the anonymous narrator shows increasing signs of anxiety about how the document might be received by readers. His sole aim being to restore the truth, he wishes to reveal that in the olden days, males were dominat...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.873
Threshold uncertainty score0.509

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes britanniques contemporainesSame topicCaribbean and African Literature and CultureFrench-language works237,207