Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mussel: festivals and producersA mussel farmer in the Philippines stands by his harvest next page By E Gasataya Since ancient times, mussels have been gathered from the wild for food.There had been tales regarding mussel eating, and one of the earliest is from the west coast of America 2,400 years ago when the inhabitants turned to mussels because they had eaten so many abalone that the colonies were almost wiped out.All through the centuries man has learned to raise and harvest mussels in different ways.Cultured mussels can be harvested all year round, while mussel fisheries is defined by season.The start of a new season always calls for a celebration.The Dutch celebrates the most popular festival each year in mid-July in Yerseke, the country's "mussel capital."All the major operators attend the event that attracts attention from the world's media.The harvest is loaded onto lorries which are lined up behind an enormous banner depicting bowls of mussels.In Menai Strait in North Wales, there is also a mussel festival.This is supported by a Belgian mussel-and-chips chain whose chefs cook nearly 3,000 mussels.This event comprises of parades and races, mussel cooking competition and demonstrations, fairs and exhibits, and many more.In Bantry Bay, Ireland, an annual mussel festival is also held, and is supported by the individual operators and the Irish Sea Fisheries Board.The event includes jazz festival with non-stop music, mussel eating competitions, seafood stalls, helicopter trips around the bay, boat trips and a gala seafood banquet.Other countries have also their own mussel festival like in Europe such as Italy, France and Spain and in the other side of Atlantic in Nova Scotia and Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.111 | 0.043 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".