MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2536407445 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.160581

Requiring physicians to dispense mifepristone: an unnecessary limit on safety and access to medical abortion

2016· article· en· W2536407445 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Wendy V. Norman, Judith A. Soon

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Health and Contraception
Canadian institutionsWomen's Health Research InstituteUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMichael Smith Health Research BCPublic Health AgencyPublic Health Agency of Canada
KeywordsMifepristoneMedical abortionAbortionMedicineAlternative medicineGold standard (test)Medical emergencyFamily medicineMisoprostolPregnancyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mifepristone, the gold standard drug for medical abortion,[1][1] was approved by Health Canada on July 29, 2015.[2][2] Under the federal terms of approval, physicians who wish to prescribe this treatment for their patients are required to dispense the medication themselves, which may necessitate

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.886
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2016
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association JournalSame topicReproductive Health and ContraceptionFrench-language works237,207