MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2536582620 · doi:10.1109/icm.2009.5418584

A fast 8×8 transform for image compression

2009· article· en· W2536582620 on OpenAlexaff
Saad Bouguezel, M. Omair Ahmad, M.N.S. Swamy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Filter Design and Implementation
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscrete cosine transformTransform codingHartley transformImage compressionS transformAlgorithmComputer scienceCompression (physics)Discrete Hartley transformTop-hat transformData compressionImage (mathematics)Discrete sine transformComputationFractional Fourier transformArtificial intelligenceComputer visionMathematicsWavelet transformImage processingFourier transformDiscrete wavelet transformDigital image processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose an efficient 8×8 transform matrix for image compression by appropriately introducing some zeros in the 8×8 signed DCT matrix. We show that the proposed transform is orthogonal, which is a highly desirable property. In order to make this novel transform more attractive for recent real-time applications, we develop an efficient algorithm for its fast computation. By using this algorithm, the proposed transform requires only 18 additions to transform an 8-point sequence. Compared to the existing 8×8 approximated DCT matrices, it is shown that savings of 25% in the number of arithmetic operations can easily be achieved using the proposed transform operator without noticeable degradations in the reconstructed images. We also present simulation results using some standard test images to show the efficiency of the proposed transform in image compression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDigital Filter Design and ImplementationFrench-language works237,207