Road Curb Extraction From Mobile LiDAR Point Clouds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Automatic extraction of road curbs from uneven, unorganized, noisy, and massive 3-D point clouds is a challenging task. Existing methods often project 3-D point clouds onto 2-D planes to extract curbs. However, the projection causes loss of 3-D information, which degrades the performance of the detection. This paper presents a robust, accurate, and efficient method to extract road curbs from 3-D mobile LiDAR point clouds. Our method consists of two steps: 1) extracting candidate points of curbs based on the proposed novel energy function and 2) refining candidate points using the proposed least cost path model. We evaluated the method on a large scale of residential area (16.7 GB, 300 million points) and an urban area (1.07 GB, 20 million points) mobile LiDAR point clouds. Results indicate that the proposed method is superior to the state-of-the-art methods in terms of robustness, accuracy, and efficiency. The proposed curb extraction method achieved a completeness of 78.62% and a correctness of 83.29%. Experiments demonstrate that our method is a promising solution to extract road curbs from mobile LiDAR point clouds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".