Mechanical equilibrium, a prerequisite to unveil auxetic properties in molecular compounds
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The unique physical properties of auxetic compounds make them very attractive materials. Nevertheless, no synthesised materials known to exhibit negative Poisson’s ratio at the molecular level have been made. One way to explore such compounds is to predict potential candidates prior to their synthesis. To achieve it, multi-atom simulation is a powerful predicting tool. However, the lack of existing systems means that the crucial step of validation cannot be carried out. This paper aims to provide a procedure to predict the auxeticity of proposed molecular systems. The strategy is based on first revealing the determinant step in reaching the mechanical equilibrium of existing isotropic compounds such as polymers, or organic glasses, to compute efficiently mechanical properties. The Poisson’s ratio is found in good agreement with experimental data. The procedure is thus modified to be applied to anisotropic compounds, liquid crystals. The agreement with experimental behaviour allowed us to extrapolate the procedure to potentially auxetic compounds, thus offering great opportunities to reveal auxetic properties prior to the synthesis of the molecules.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it