Accurate Classification of Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma Into Germinal Center and Activated B Cell Subtypes Using a Nuclease Protection Assay On Formalin Fixed Paraffin Embedded Tissue: A Study From the Lymphoma and Leukemia Molecular Profiling Project.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Abstract 620 Classification of DLBCL into cell-of-origin (COO) subtypes based on gene expression profiles has well-established prognostic value. These subtypes, termed Germinal Center B cell (GCB) and Activated B cell (ABC) also have different genetic alterations and over-expression of different pathways that may serve as therapeutic targets. Thus, accurate classification is essential for analysis of clinical trial results and planning new trials using targeted agents. The gold standard for COO classification uses gene expression profiling (GEP) of snap frozen tissues, and a Bayesian predictor algorithm utilizing the expression levels of 14 key genes (G. Wright et al PNAS 2003). An immunohistochemistry (IHC) classification scheme by C. Hans et al (Blood 2004), based on 3 antibodies, is widely used as a substitute for GEP classification, however does not completely correlate with GEP. We recently described a qNPA assay (ArrayPlateR, High ThroughPut Genomics, Tucson, AZ) with excellent correlation between frozen and formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissues (R. Roberts et al, Lab Invest 2007). In this study, we investigated whether this technique could be used for accurate classification of COO using FFPE tissues. We expanded the previous gene probe repertoire of the DLBCL-ArrayPlateR assay to include the 14 genes (represented by 17 probe sets) most pertinent to COO classification. 52 cases of R-CHOP treated DLBCL that had undergone GEP using the Affymetrix U133 Plus 2.0 microarray and had matching FFPE blocks were analyzed with qNPA in duplicate. The genes included CD10, LRMP, CCND2, ITPKB, PIM1, IL16, IRF4, FUT8, BCL6, PTPN1, LM02, CD39, MYBL1, IGHM. Results were evaluated using the previously published algorithm with a leave-one-out cross validation scheme to classify cases into GCB or ABC subtypes. These results were compared to COO classification based on frozen tissue GEP profiles. All 14 genes in all 52 cases were successfully analyzed with no missing data points. For each case, a probability statistic was generated indicating the likelihood that the classification using qNPA was accurate. Of the 54 cases, 25 were GCB, 27 were ABC and 4 were unclassifiable by GEP. Of the GCB cases, 23/25 (92%) were classified correctly by qNPA with a confidence cut-off of >0.9 and 25/25 (100%) classified correctly with a confidence cut-off of >0.8. Of the ABC cases, 25/27 (93%) were correctly classified as ABC using qNPA with a confidence cut-off of >0.9 and 27/27 (100%) classified correctly with a confidence cut-off of >0.8. In summary, the qNPA technique accurately categorized DLBCL into GCB and ABC subtypes, as defined by GEP. There were no technical difficulties with any of the pathological materials although they were collected retrospectively from a variety of institutions and countries with different fixation methods. This approach represents a substantial improvement over previously published IHC methods and is applicable to FFPE tissues, therefore overcoming the need for snap frozen materials. This technically robust classification method has potential to have a significant impact on future DLBCL research and clinical trial development. Disclosures: Rimsza: High Throughput Genomics: HTG provided the assays at no charge to Dr. Rimsza's lab. Schwartz:High Throughput Genomics: Employment. Gascoyne:Roche Canada: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".