MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2536919248 · doi:10.21810/sfuer.v9i.303

Synergistic, ecological education development: The Vietnam Consortium Fellowship Program

2016· article· en· W2536919248 on OpenAlexfundvenueaboutno aff
Allan MacKinnon

Bibliographic record

VenueSFU Educational Review · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicScience Education and Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSimon Fraser University
KeywordsVietnameseCurriculumAgency (philosophy)Curriculum developmentScience educationPolitical scienceLibrary scienceInternational developmentMedical educationSociologyPedagogyMedicineSocial scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents an analysis of a learning community that formed in a project in science curriculum development at the tertiary level in Vietnam during the nineties. This ‘Vietnamese Consortium Fellowship Program’ was funded by the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) and delivered through Simon Fraser University (SFU) from 1993 to 1999. The aim of the project was to develop and implement a master of science (MSc) program in science curriculum research for twenty young professors of science selected from among the eleven universities of the consortium to assist in developing an educationally sound, up-to-date basic science curriculum for the initial phase of post-secondary science education in Vietnam.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.445
Teacher spread0.365 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSFU Educational ReviewSame topicScience Education and PedagogyFrench-language works237,207