MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2536935256 · doi:10.5703/1288284316260

The Library’s Role in the Changing World of Textbooks: Where Do We Go From Here?

2016· article· en· W2536935256 on OpenAlexaff
Emily Ray

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOpen Education and E-Learning
Canadian institutionsPurdue Pharma (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPresentation (obstetrics)PurchasingLibrary scienceComputer scienceWorld Wide WebElectronic bookResource (disambiguation)Collection developmentOpen educational resourcesPrioritizationMultimediaEngineering managementBusinessEngineeringMarketingProcess management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This presentation examines the library’s role as options proliferate regarding textbooks in higher education— due to the high cost of textbooks. It considers the prioritization of textbooks outside the university and the library, and it covers both the Ottenheimer Library’s (at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock—UALR) pilot project to purchase textbooks and the experience of two other libraries with purchasing textbooks, print and electronic. It looks at the growth of open educational resource (OER) textbooks and how they are presented to potential users. The author also discusses the results of three libraries with pilot projects to incentivize faculty to switch to OER textbooks and how these projects impacted the libraries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.930
Threshold uncertainty score0.571

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOpen Education and E-LearningFrench-language works237,207