Differences In the Short Term Granulocyte and Platelet Producing Activity of Cord Blood and Mobilized Peripheral Blood Transplants Revealed by Quantitative Repopulation Assays In NOD/SCID-IL-2Rγc−/− Mice.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Abstract 3733 Human G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood (mPB) progenitor harvests collected by leukapheresis have become the usual transplant of choice when a suitable normal histocompatible or unrelated adult donor is available for patients requiring a transplant. Unfortunately, for most such patients such a donor is not available and, for these individuals, an autotransplant or unrelated cord blood (CB) unit provide potential alternatives. Autologous harvests are frequently compromised by prior exposure to chemotherapy, and the relatively small size of a single CB unit, can also pose significant problems, particularly in adult recipients. These typically involve pronounced delays in neutrophil recovery and almost always a protracted and/or poor recovery in platelet output. Interestingly, although the simultaneous transplantation of multiple CB units has successfully reduced graft failure, timely hematopoietic recovery is still not commonly achieved, especially for the platelets. There is thus a compelling need to understand the types of repopulating cells that are present in different mPB and CB harvests and how these may vary numerically and biologically. Such information is key to devising better surrogate predictors of adequate engrafting potential and as a first step towards developing new approaches to improve the utility of CB and poor mPB harvests for clinical transplant applications. To pursue these issues, we have developed new assays for quantifying different types of human cells with different durabilities of platelet and granulocyte generating activity in sublethally irradiated NOD/SCID-IL-2Rγc−/− (NSG) mice and have now used these assays to compare the numbers and output properties of different phenotypically characterized subpopulations of cells present in CB and normal mPB samples. Consistent with previous reports, we found that >90% of the week-3 bone marrow repopulating activity in transplanted mice was contained within the Lin−ALDH+ fraction regardless of the source of the human cells tested. However, a substantial proportion of early (week 2) platelet repopulating activity came from the Lin−ALDH− fraction of both CB and mPB (30% for CB and 61% for mPB, decreasing to 12% and 16% respectively by week 3). In vitro CFU-Mk (and CFU-GM/BFU-E/CFU-GEMM) assays reflected a similar differential distribution between the Lin−ALDH+ and Lin−ALDH− cells from the two sources, suggesting possible overlap in the corresponding in vitro and in vivo endpoints. Interestingly, at 3 weeks post-transplant, we found the Lin−ALDH+ cells from mPB produced more of the GM cells than the platelets as compared to the Lin−ALDH+ cells from CB. Limiting dilution assays revealed that the actual frequency of week-3 GM-repopulating cells (GMRC-3wks) and platelet-repopulating cells (PRC-3wks) in Lin−ALDH+ cells in mPB (1/2500, 95% CI=1/1500–1/4200 and 1/3300, 95% CI=1/1900–1/5600) is actually about 3-fold lower (p<0.05) than that in CB (1/780, 95% CI=1/470–1/1300 and 1/1300, 95% CI=1/800–1/2000). Thus, the average mature cell output per RC of either type is correspondingly higher in mPB than in CB (≂f8-fold for GMRC-3wks and 4-fold for PRC-3wks). Based on these findings and knowledge of the median cell dose used for clinical transplants of mPB and a single CB unit, we estimated that adults transplanted with the latter would receive ≂f35-fold less GMRC-3wks and PRC-3wks than what would be given in a typical mPB transplant. In summary, our results show that discontinued ALDH activity identifies many of the cells in both mPB and CB that are responsible for very rapid (within 2–3 weeks) but transient production of mature myeloid cells and platelets post-transplant versus those with persistent ALDH activity that are required for the more prolonged output of these cells (>3 weeks). In addition, our results demonstrate that the 3-week RCs in mPB and CB differ in their average clonal outputs of mature GM cells and platelets in vivo, suggesting ontogeny-related changes in the mechanisms that determine this functional parameter. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".