Study on the Experiment of Cultivating the Peer Interpersonal Skill of the Children in the Kindergarten
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This purpose of research is that cultivating the peer interpersonal skill of the children in the kindergarten of the linguistic& non-linguistic competence, pro-social behavior & social obstacle. Research methods are on-the-spot experimental and observational method. The results are that the difference is significance in the total level of the children’s peer interpersonal skill between the experimental group and the control group (p＜0.05), that the difference is significance in the linguistic & non-linguistic competence and the children’s interaction obstacle between the experimental group and the control group (p＜0.05). But that the difference is no significance in the social initiative and pro-social between the experimental group and the control group (p＞0.05). The conclusion is that it is effective for teachers to intervene in children’s peer interaction during the experiment. It can become the appropriate education measures to improve the peer interpersonal skill of the children in the kindergarten.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".