Multiscale symmetric part detection and grouping
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Skeletonization algorithms typically decompose an object's silhouette into a set of symmetric parts, offering a powerful representation for shape categorization. However, having access to an object's silhouette assumes correct figure-ground segmentation, leading to a disconnect with the mainstream categorization community, which attempts to recognize objects from cluttered images. In this paper, we present a novel approach to recovering and grouping the symmetric parts of an object from a cluttered scene. We begin by using a multiresolution superpixel segmentation to generate medial point hypotheses, and use a learned affinity function to perceptually group nearby medial points likely to belong to the same medial branch. In the next stage, we learn higher granularity affinity functions to group the resulting medial branches likely to belong to the same object. The resulting framework yields a skeletal approximation that's free of many of the instabilities plaguing traditional skeletons. More importantly, it doesn't require a closed contour, enabling the application of skeleton-based categorization systems to more realistic imagery
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it