MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2537390121 · doi:10.1109/ias.2001.955997

Direct power control of DSTATCOMs for voltage flicker mitigation

2002· article· en· W2537390121 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Quality and Harmonics
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHarmonicsControl theory (sociology)FlickerHarmonicVoltageController (irrigation)AC powerVoltage optimisationComputer sciencePower controlPower (physics)Electronic engineeringEngineeringControl (management)Electrical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Distribution static synchronous compensators (DSTATCOMs) are a viable solution for improving power quality in distribution systems, including mitigation for temporary interruptions, voltage dips, harmonics and voltage flicker. Conventional DSTATCOMs are implemented using two cascaded loops, an AC current control loop and a DC-bus voltage loop. This paper proposes an alternative control structure based on the simultaneous control of line current and DC-link voltage by means of instantaneous power control. The instantaneous real and imaginary power calculation is derived and explained. Requirements for flicker and harmonic mitigation are identified. The controller is implemented using two hysteresis comparators and an optimum switching table. The features of the proposed technique are illustrated by means of simulation and experimental results. Advantages include a simple and robust control structure, and better tracking of load fluctuations and/or harmonics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.923
Threshold uncertainty score0.585

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Quality and HarmonicsFrench-language works237,207