Effect of Overweight and Obesity (Defined by Asian-Specific Cutoff Criteria) on Left Ventricular Diastolic Function and Structure in a General Korean Population
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although obesity is a well-known risk factor for cardiovascular disease, the cutoff of body mass index (BMI) for elevated cardiovascular risk is still controversial in Asian. Thus, this study was conducted to investigate the functional and structural changes of the left ventricle (LV) according to the degree of obesity in a general Korean population. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 31,334 apparently healthy Korean adults who underwent echocardiography were enrolled. The study population was stratified into 5 groups according to the degree of obesity classified by the Asian-Pacific obesity guideline. The odd ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) of impaired LV diastolic function, LV remodeling, and hypertrophy were compared among the 5 groups using multivariable logistic regression analysis. When the normal group was set as the reference, the adjusted ORs (95% CI) for impaired LV diastolic function showed a proportional relationship with BMI [OR; 0.86 (95% CI 0.59-1.22) in underweight, 1.81 (95% CI 1.63-2.00) in overweight, 2.75 (95% CI 2.49-3.03) in obese, and 4.34 (95% CI 3.65-5.16) in severe obese]. Adjusted ORs for LV remodeling and hypertrophy significantly increased proportional to BMI. CONCLUSIONS: ) was significantly associated with impaired LV diastolic function, remodeling, and hypertrophy. (Circ J 2016; 80: 2489-2495).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it