MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2537409933 · doi:10.1176/appi.pn.2016.10b3

Free Online Training Modules Hoped to Attract More Students to Psychiatry

2016· article· en· W2537409933 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mark Moran

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychiatric News · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMental Health and Psychiatry
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkforceMedical educationPsychologyTable of contentsMedicinePolitical scienceComputer scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Back to table of contents Previous article Next article Education and TrainingFull AccessFree Online Training Modules Hoped to Attract More Students to PsychiatryMark MoranMark MoranPublished Online:17 Oct 2016https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.pn.2016.10b3AbstractThe ADMSEP Clinical Skills Initiative is the first clinician-generated, national e-platform for medical students in psychiatry and fills a gap in content left by commercial educational sites.A free, open-access library of online learning modules about core psychiatric diagnoses, developed by medical school psychiatry educators, appears to be attracting a growing national and international audience of students and educators. Howard Liu, M.D., along with Martin Klapheke, M.D., helped to initiate the ADMSEP Clinical Skills Initiative. "We decided we were going to be the garage-band version of MedU for psychiatry and make online learning modules free to the public."Howard Liu, M.D.The Association of Directors of Medical School Education in Psychiatry (ADMSEP) Clinical Skills Initiative (CSI) is an online library of publicly available educational video modules. It is the first clinician-generated, national e-platform for medical students in psychiatry and fills a gap in content left by commercial educational sites—such as MedU, which does not include content in psychiatry.Because the modules are open access to the public, they hold the promise of helping to attract students to the field of psychiatry. "The CSI modules prepare the medical students and the future workforce by providing high-quality examples of common psychiatric disorders and help further medical student understanding about how to better interface with patients," said Brenda Roman, M.D., a past president of ADMSEP and assistant dean for curriculum and medical education research in the Office of Medical Education at Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine. "Since the modules are available to the public on the ADMSEP website, they could be used for more general patient and public education about common psychiatric disorders."The modules, which are peer reviewed, are also posted on Mededportal.org, an open repository of peer-reviewed resources sponsored by the Association of American Medical Colleges. Today, the CSI project comprises 10 modules covering the psychiatric interview, adolescent depression, childhood posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), insomnia, adult PTSD, personality disorders, anxiety disorders, bipolar disorder, neurocognitive disorders, and psychotic disorders. A least six other modules are in various stages of development. "This curriculum helps supplement live patient exposure and is a very versatile tool that can be incorporated into various types of teaching for students from the first year in medical school through junior residency years," Adrianna Foster, M.D., co-chair of the ADMSEP CSI project and vice chair for clinical and research programs at Florida International University Wertheim College of Medicine.Her co-chair is Raed Hawa, M.D., director of undergraduate medical education in psychiatry and deputy director of the psychiatry clerkship program at the University of Toronto.The project was initiated in 2010 by Howard Liu, M.D., and Martin Klapheke, M.D. In an interview with Psychiatric News, Liu said that guidelines from the Liaison Committee on Medical Education require that students must have a learning experience with all of the core diagnoses in each clerkship specialty. "If they don't have an actual patient encounter, you have to find some way to simulate that experience," he said. Liu and Klapheke brought together an initial cohort of interested educators, found software for publishing videos and text-based didactic material, and began to develop their own modules."Our goal was to gather together modules on all of the core diagnoses in DSM," he said. "We decided we were going to be the garage-band version of MedU for psychiatry and make online learning modules free to the public. It's been a learning curve, but the project has taken off."Each module includes a text description and educational objectives on the opening page; the live modules include didactic text material as well as videos of standardized patients being interviewed by senior faculty. In the last year, the modules have had 45,089 page views, or approximately 123 views a day, and 43 percent of all the visits to the ADMSEP website. Moreover, more recent figures reveal the CSI web pages were viewed in over 30 different countries. Module authors are provided Google Analytic data on viewership, which provides feedback as well as documentation of their module's dissemination. In addition to full-length modules, brief video clips excerpted from the full modules are also available for some of the diagnoses. These clips can be used in a number of ways—to briefly illustrate clinical material during a lecture or learning-on-the-fly teaching rounds and to stimulate small group discussions. The CSI task force is encouraging ADMSEP members to use these video clips for teaching purposes, as long as attribution is given to the module authors.In addition to Foster, Hawa, Liu, and Klapheke, the ADMSEP CSI Task Force includes Michael Marcangelo, M.D., of the University of Chicago; Hendry Ton, M.D., of the University of California, Davis; Susan Lehmann, M.D., of Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; David Schilling, M.D., of Loyola University Chicago; and Brian Smith, M.D., of Michigan State University. Hawa told Psychiatric News that members of the CSI project welcome the submission of new modules. He said the project is attracting an international audience of educators and students who have a new venue to communicate with each other. "We are creating this online community of people who can talk to each other outside of the traditional classroom," he said. Also, Hawa believes that the CSI project can help attract more students to psychiatry. "I think the accessibility of the learning modules can help students feel more comfortable learning about psychiatry—students who might otherwise be uncomfortable because of stigma, unknown issues working with patients with psychiatric illness, and what they hear on the news," he said. "The ability to see patients being interviewed by competent professionals and learning how to engage a patient, identify pitfalls, and identify ways to improve can make students feel much more safe. Once they are comfortable, they can begin to explore the field on their own." ■The ADMSEP CSI modules can be accessed here. ISSUES NewArchived

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.675
Threshold uncertainty score0.464

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6750.402

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsychiatric NewsSame topicMental Health and PsychiatryFrench-language works237,207