MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2537456774 · doi:10.1109/prttc.1995.518067

A strategic approach for dispatch

2002· article· en· W2537456774 on OpenAlexaff
C.M.G. Anchieta, Julie Martin, Mathieu Trudel

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicQuality and Supply Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProfitability indexHaulageEconomic dispatchOrder (exchange)Context (archaeology)TRIPS architectureProductivityTruckService (business)Industrial organizationBusinessComputer scienceOperations researchEconomicsFinanceEngineeringMarketingElectric power system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increase of the average transport distances and number of trips, the decrease of equipment productivity and the specialisation of services and vehicles are the most important repercussions of the current economic context on the goods transport industry. Dispatch is highly affected by those constraints in so far as it realizes the "goods-drivers-trucks-trips" allocation. The dispatch strategy has direct repercussions on the profitability of the company. In fact, if the dispatch strategy is supply-oriented and aimed to increase equipment productivity, the company will be limited by its own capacities and resources. On the other hand, if the strategy is demand-oriented with regard to satisfy the maximum of it, the company must strive to find resources in order to satisfy its immediate needs. Therefore, which strategy would be the best with regard to the new economic context? The authors present a strategic approach for dispatch as one which can contribute significant competitive advantages to goods haulage companies. They also propose dispatch strategies which can be implemented by these companies in order to better manage operating costs and service differentiation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.008
Scholarly communication0.0080.005
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicQuality and Supply ManagementFrench-language works237,207