Power System Operator in Mexico Reveals Millions in Savings by Updating Its Short-Term Thermal Unit Commitment Model
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 2013, Centro Nacional de Control de Energía (CENACE), which is Mexico’s power system operator, updated its short-term hydrothermal coordination planning (STHTCP) tool. CENACE utilized commercial software to solve mixed-integer programming models for the unit commitment and economic dispatch of thermal units, such as gas, coal-fired, and combined-cycle plants. In an earlier paper that we reference, authors of this paper describe the mathematical model for the thermal unit commitment (TUC) problem, which is a sub-problem in the STHTCP process. The new STHTCP tool, which uses a mixed-integer programming-based TUC approach, has enhanced the modeling and solution quality compared to the Lagrangian relaxation-based TUC approach. The new tool has improved CENACE’s operations for managing its existing infrastructure, including power stations and transmission lines, and establishing the marginal prices needed to make energy trades. From the beginning of 2013 to the end of 2014, CENACE saved $2.2 million annually, which it attributes to better management of its thermal units. Over 10 years, it anticipates that these savings will represent more than $20 million in total savings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it