MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Unitary-Feedback-Improved Qubit Initialization in the Dispersive Regime

2015· article· en· W2537570222 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Applied · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Information and Cryptography
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersArmy Research OfficeSeventh Framework ProgrammeNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsQubitQuantum information processingLimit (mathematics)InitializationQuantumRotation (mathematics)Phase qubitMechanism (biology)Scheme (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In quantum information processing one strives for quantum nondemolition (QND) measurements, which are least likely to perturb the subsequent evolution of the system. The authors show, however, that common superconducting-qubit readout schemes are in fact not QND. They identify a mechanism that induces an effective coherent rotation of the qubit, which means that such a scheme is QND only in the limit of infinite measurement time. This affects any protocol where measurement is used during computation, and therefore is of immediate importance to contemporary experiments. Thankfully, the authors also explain how to fix the problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.323

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review AppliedSame topicQuantum Information and CryptographyFrench-language works237,207