GeoDF: Towards a SDI-based PPGIS Application for E-Governance
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Research and development of Public Participation Geographic Information Systems (PPGIS) has been a branch of GIS study for more than a decade. Using WebGIS and communication tools for public participation, both citizens and municipalities benefit from a more efficient "24/7", GIS-enabled communication and information-sharing platform. PPGIS demands open access to information, and the success of such applications relies heavily upon the availability of appropriate geospatial information. The framework data and institutional mechanisms offered by (particularly local) Spatial Data Infrastructures (SDIs) have the potential to offer an open and ideal environment for PPGIS applications. This paper investigates the potential integration of PPGIS into existing SDIs to empower grassroots communities, increase citizen participation and enlarge the use of geospatial information by the general public. Building on earlier PPGIS research conducted at UNB, a GIS-enabled online discussion forum (GeoDF) prototype is now being implemented as a pilot project in
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it